Saturday, June 27, 2009
Kemelut politik: Nik Aziz ajak PM berdebat secara terbuka
KOTA BAHARU: Mursyidul Am PAS, Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat menjemput Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak mengadakan debat terbuka bagi menyelesaikan kekalutan politik yang berlaku sejak sekian lama antara Umno dan PAS.
Menteri Besar Kelantan itu juga berkata, draf surat jemputan rasmi kepada Presiden Umno untuk mengadakan perdebatan itu telah siap dirangka dan akan dihantar dalam tempoh terdekat.
"Jemputan itu sengaja dibuat memandangkan kekecohan yang berlaku dalam politik hari ini, terutama antara PAS dan Umno," katanya kepada pemberita selepas mengimamkan Solat Sunat Dhuha di perkarangan Pasar Siti Khadijah, di sini pagi ini.
Hadir sama pada majlis sempena sambutan Bulan Sembahyang itu ialah Pengerusi Jawatankuasa Pendidikan, Pembangunan Islam dan Dakwah Negeri Datuk Mohd Amar Nik Abdullah.
Nik Aziz berkata, hasrat untuk mengadakan perdebatan itu dibuat berikutan tindakan Pergerakan Pemuda Umno Kelantan membuat laporan polis berhubung kenyataan beliau dalam satu ceramah politik pada 21 Jun lepas, yang didakwa berbaur hasutan dan boleh mencetuskan ketegangan.
Katanya, perkara yang berlaku sekarang tidak akan selesai hanya dengan menggunakan media sebagai saluran tetapi mesti dibincang secara berdepan.BERNAMA
Thursday, June 25, 2009
RM12.5 billiion PKFZ scandal – Parliament entitled to know the reasons why the Cabinet chopped and changed week-by-week its decision in October/Nov.
25 Jun 2009
Lim Kit Siang
Today’s Star under the report “PKFZ probe under wraps for now” reads:
Malaysian Anti-Corruption (MACC) is not obliged to disclose the progress of investigations into the Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) to the Public Accounts Committee (PAC).
PAC member William Leong (PKR-Selayang) said MACC Commissioner had informed the PAC that the PKFZ issue was still under probe and Section 29 of the MACC Act 2008 does not allow the commission to disclose any information about the investigation to the PAC.
Unfortunately we were unable to get any information as to the situation of the investigation, when the investigation will end and whether any action would be taken against anyone,” he said.
Leong said he was disappointed with MACC’s reply, adding that several reports over the PKFZ were lodged with MACC, or ACA, since w2004.
Chief Commissioner Datuk Seri Ahmad Hamdan had spent an hour at the PAC meeting yesterday but did not reveal the investigation into the alleged irregularities in PKFZ.”
What the MACC Chief Commissioner had committed is no less than parliamentary contempt in refusing to co-operate with the PAC in its investigations into the PKFZ scandal.
Why is Ahmad suddenly so shy about reporting the progress of MACC investigations into the PKFZ scandal when he had no hesitation to go to the public about MACC investigations into the allegations of abuses of power and corrupt practices against the Pakatan Rakyat Selangor Mentri Besar, Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim over cars and cows?
The MACC should rightly stand for “Malaysian Agency for Cars and Cows”!
The MACC has proved its utter lack of independence when it could be dragooned into serving the Barisan Nasional political agenda in its illegal power grab in Perak to harass the legitimate Pakatan Rakyat Perak Speaker V. Sivakumar.
The Star today has another report, headlined: “Lim Know the facts, say Ong“, which reads:
PETALING JAYA: DAP parliamentary leader Lim Kit Siang deliberately misled the Dewan Rakyat on the Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) issue despite knowing the facts of the project, Transport Minister Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat said.
Ong said Lim knew about the RM25 per square foot land purchase as he was engaged in the debate in Parliament, in 2007.
“He rudely interrupted my ministerial statement by accusing me of not referring to the Cabinet decision on Oct 23, 2002, that the land should be acquired at a lower price of RM10.16 per square foot.
“What Kit Siang conveniently omitted to mention was that the decision on Oct 23, was subsequently superseded by the Cabinet in its meeting on Nov 6, 2002,” he said in his blog (www.teekeat.net) yesterday.
Ong challenged Lim to admit that he had deliberately misled and confused the public by failing to disclose the full and proper account of Cabinet decisions on the PKFZ project.
“The DAP leader may not be a Cabinet member but the Parliamentary Hansard, dated Sept 4, 2007, clearly recorded that the decision of the Cabinet on Oct 2, 2002 to purchase the land at RM25 per square foot continued to stand for the reasons mentioned in my parliamentary statement,” he said.
Ong said Lim knew this and he was in fact engaged in a debate on this matter on Sept 4, 2007.
“He even posted excerpts of the Hansard in his blog the very next day.
“And yet he chose to suppress this important fact from the public for the sake of a political gimmick bent on rescuing his fading political career,” Ong said.
I find this accusation by Ong, more appropriately referred to as the Minister for Air Shows, most astounding.
It must be the first case not only in Malaysia but in Commonwealth parliamentary history where a Cabinet Minister accuses an Opposition MP for not telling the whole truth about Cabinet decisions on a project, in this case the RM12.5 billion PKFZ scandal!
Ong claims to be incensed that I had not mentioned the Nov. 6, 2002 Cabinet meeting when he was presenting his Ministerial statement in Parliament on Monday.
How could I do so when even to mention the Oct. 23, 2002 Cabinet decision, there were so many protests and objections from the Barisan Nasional Ministers and MPs, led by Ong himself.
Did Ong allow me to talk and reveal more? Didn’t he take the position that with regard to his ministerial statement, no question or interruptions were allowed?
Yes, I knew about the November 4, 2002 Cabinet meeting, but it was Ong who misled Parliament with a selective account in his Ministerial statement while refusing to allow me to say anything to correct him.
This is why I had challenged Ong to give a full account of all the Cabinet meetings and decisions in connection with the PKFZ project all the way back to 1999, especially the Cabinet decisions of October/November 2002 and July 2007.
PKFZ concerns not only the Transport Ministry but also the Finance Ministry. I hereby ask the Deputy Finance Minister, Datuk Dr. Awang Adek, who was also the Deputy Finance Minister in 2007, to give a full account in his reply of all the Cabinet meetings and decisions on PKFZ right from the very beginning.
In particular, Awang should state whether he could confirm the following Cabinet meetings and decisions:
On 2nd October 2002, Cabinet agreed to the purchase of the land for the PKFZ project based on Transport Minister’s information that the project was viable and did not require any government financial assistance and that legal issues surrounding the land concerned had been resolved.
On 9th October Cabinet agreed to defer implementation of the Oct. 2 decision, pending reports by Finance Ministry and Attorney-General’s Chambers.
On 16th Oct. 2002, Cabinet informed of Attorney-General’s position that the land had too many encumbrances and “willing buyer, willing seller” transaction not proper. Finance Ministry asked to submit report.
On 23rd October 2002, Cabinet agreed that land be acquired by Transport Ministry under section 3(1)(a) of Land Acquisition Act 1960 at RM10.16 psf. Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd (KDSB) to be given the opportunity to level and build basic infrastructure at a price to be negotiated and to be finalized by the Finance Ministry if it is above RM100 million. Among the reasons why the Cabinet reversed the Oct. 2, 2002 decision were:
The land has too many encumbrances with at least eight charges and five caveats and that Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd (KDSD) had made misrepresentation which may be fraudulent misrepresentation;
That the issue of “willing buyer and willing seller” does not arise as KDSB was unable to transfer title free from encumbrance to the government;
That from corporate information, KDSB was a company with bank liabilities.
On 6th November, 2002 Cabinet reversed its decision of Oct. 23, 2002 and upheld its Oct. 2, 2002 decision.
Parliament is entitled to know what were the reasons which caused the Cabinet to chop and change week-by-week its decision on the PKFZ land question, which has landed the country with a RM12.5 billion PKFZ scandal.
Lim Kit Siang
Today’s Star under the report “PKFZ probe under wraps for now” reads:
Malaysian Anti-Corruption (MACC) is not obliged to disclose the progress of investigations into the Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) to the Public Accounts Committee (PAC).
PAC member William Leong (PKR-Selayang) said MACC Commissioner had informed the PAC that the PKFZ issue was still under probe and Section 29 of the MACC Act 2008 does not allow the commission to disclose any information about the investigation to the PAC.
Unfortunately we were unable to get any information as to the situation of the investigation, when the investigation will end and whether any action would be taken against anyone,” he said.
Leong said he was disappointed with MACC’s reply, adding that several reports over the PKFZ were lodged with MACC, or ACA, since w2004.
Chief Commissioner Datuk Seri Ahmad Hamdan had spent an hour at the PAC meeting yesterday but did not reveal the investigation into the alleged irregularities in PKFZ.”
What the MACC Chief Commissioner had committed is no less than parliamentary contempt in refusing to co-operate with the PAC in its investigations into the PKFZ scandal.
Why is Ahmad suddenly so shy about reporting the progress of MACC investigations into the PKFZ scandal when he had no hesitation to go to the public about MACC investigations into the allegations of abuses of power and corrupt practices against the Pakatan Rakyat Selangor Mentri Besar, Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim over cars and cows?
The MACC should rightly stand for “Malaysian Agency for Cars and Cows”!
The MACC has proved its utter lack of independence when it could be dragooned into serving the Barisan Nasional political agenda in its illegal power grab in Perak to harass the legitimate Pakatan Rakyat Perak Speaker V. Sivakumar.
The Star today has another report, headlined: “Lim Know the facts, say Ong“, which reads:
PETALING JAYA: DAP parliamentary leader Lim Kit Siang deliberately misled the Dewan Rakyat on the Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) issue despite knowing the facts of the project, Transport Minister Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat said.
Ong said Lim knew about the RM25 per square foot land purchase as he was engaged in the debate in Parliament, in 2007.
“He rudely interrupted my ministerial statement by accusing me of not referring to the Cabinet decision on Oct 23, 2002, that the land should be acquired at a lower price of RM10.16 per square foot.
“What Kit Siang conveniently omitted to mention was that the decision on Oct 23, was subsequently superseded by the Cabinet in its meeting on Nov 6, 2002,” he said in his blog (www.teekeat.net) yesterday.
Ong challenged Lim to admit that he had deliberately misled and confused the public by failing to disclose the full and proper account of Cabinet decisions on the PKFZ project.
“The DAP leader may not be a Cabinet member but the Parliamentary Hansard, dated Sept 4, 2007, clearly recorded that the decision of the Cabinet on Oct 2, 2002 to purchase the land at RM25 per square foot continued to stand for the reasons mentioned in my parliamentary statement,” he said.
Ong said Lim knew this and he was in fact engaged in a debate on this matter on Sept 4, 2007.
“He even posted excerpts of the Hansard in his blog the very next day.
“And yet he chose to suppress this important fact from the public for the sake of a political gimmick bent on rescuing his fading political career,” Ong said.
I find this accusation by Ong, more appropriately referred to as the Minister for Air Shows, most astounding.
It must be the first case not only in Malaysia but in Commonwealth parliamentary history where a Cabinet Minister accuses an Opposition MP for not telling the whole truth about Cabinet decisions on a project, in this case the RM12.5 billion PKFZ scandal!
Ong claims to be incensed that I had not mentioned the Nov. 6, 2002 Cabinet meeting when he was presenting his Ministerial statement in Parliament on Monday.
How could I do so when even to mention the Oct. 23, 2002 Cabinet decision, there were so many protests and objections from the Barisan Nasional Ministers and MPs, led by Ong himself.
Did Ong allow me to talk and reveal more? Didn’t he take the position that with regard to his ministerial statement, no question or interruptions were allowed?
Yes, I knew about the November 4, 2002 Cabinet meeting, but it was Ong who misled Parliament with a selective account in his Ministerial statement while refusing to allow me to say anything to correct him.
This is why I had challenged Ong to give a full account of all the Cabinet meetings and decisions in connection with the PKFZ project all the way back to 1999, especially the Cabinet decisions of October/November 2002 and July 2007.
PKFZ concerns not only the Transport Ministry but also the Finance Ministry. I hereby ask the Deputy Finance Minister, Datuk Dr. Awang Adek, who was also the Deputy Finance Minister in 2007, to give a full account in his reply of all the Cabinet meetings and decisions on PKFZ right from the very beginning.
In particular, Awang should state whether he could confirm the following Cabinet meetings and decisions:
On 2nd October 2002, Cabinet agreed to the purchase of the land for the PKFZ project based on Transport Minister’s information that the project was viable and did not require any government financial assistance and that legal issues surrounding the land concerned had been resolved.
On 9th October Cabinet agreed to defer implementation of the Oct. 2 decision, pending reports by Finance Ministry and Attorney-General’s Chambers.
On 16th Oct. 2002, Cabinet informed of Attorney-General’s position that the land had too many encumbrances and “willing buyer, willing seller” transaction not proper. Finance Ministry asked to submit report.
On 23rd October 2002, Cabinet agreed that land be acquired by Transport Ministry under section 3(1)(a) of Land Acquisition Act 1960 at RM10.16 psf. Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd (KDSB) to be given the opportunity to level and build basic infrastructure at a price to be negotiated and to be finalized by the Finance Ministry if it is above RM100 million. Among the reasons why the Cabinet reversed the Oct. 2, 2002 decision were:
The land has too many encumbrances with at least eight charges and five caveats and that Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd (KDSD) had made misrepresentation which may be fraudulent misrepresentation;
That the issue of “willing buyer and willing seller” does not arise as KDSB was unable to transfer title free from encumbrance to the government;
That from corporate information, KDSB was a company with bank liabilities.
On 6th November, 2002 Cabinet reversed its decision of Oct. 23, 2002 and upheld its Oct. 2, 2002 decision.
Parliament is entitled to know what were the reasons which caused the Cabinet to chop and change week-by-week its decision on the PKFZ land question, which has landed the country with a RM12.5 billion PKFZ scandal.
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
UNTUNGNYA BERSUAMI BOROI
Suami boroi tanda bahagia?
Salam Sejahtera..
Aku ada terbaca satu posting yang baik untuk kita semua Di SINI. Kemudian aku ada dapat satu email dari Mahligai-Yahoo Group mengenai satu kisah seperti tajuk di atas.... Jadi sebagai sokongan moral aku terhadap posting tersebut aku siarkan melalui copy & paste... dibawah,
SAYA ada membaca satu artikel di dalam akhbar baru-baru ini mengenai isu suami boroi. Dalam ulasan artikel berkenaan seolah menceritakan bahawa suami yang boroi menandakan mereka sangat bahagia hidup berumah tangga. Saya berkahwin 3 tahun lalu, dan mempunyai seorang cahaya mata. Di awal perkahwinan suami saya berbadan kurus dengan berat lebih kurang 59 kilogram dan berperut leper. Namun setelah 3 tahun berkahwin beratnya mencecah 72 kilogram dan perutnya sudah mula membuncit seperti wanita mengandung 3-4 bulan. Namun dia masih sihat dan tidak dirundung penyakit. Jika benar artikel berkenaan, benarkah perut suami saya yang buncit itu tanda dia amat bahagia hidup berumah tangga dengan saya?
ISTERI BAHAGIA,
Hulu Langat.
JAWAPAN
Isu ini telah didebatkan berkurun lamanya. Lelaki akan bertambah berat badan setelah berumah tangga adalah suatu perkara biasa dan ianya pasti berlaku. Lelaki bujang lebih cenderung hidup aktif, kurang makan dan kurang waktu rehat. Ke sana dan ke mari bersama teman-teman dan setiap masa dipenuhi aktiviti. Malah waktu dan pola pemakanan mereka juga tidak menentu. Lebih-lebih lagi lelaki yang hidup berjauhan dari keluarga.
Oleh itu hampir kesemua lelaki bujang berperut leper dan berat badan mereka sekitar 48-60 kilogram. Namun setelah seseorang lelaki itu mendirikan rumah tangga, dari tahun ke setahun berat badan mereka akan bertambah. Ini adalah kerana mereka sudah tidak lagi hidup aktif. Lebih banyak masa dihabiskan bersama anak dan isteri di rumah. Jadual makan yang teratur, tambah apabila mendapat isteri yang pandai dan gemar memasak. Hampir semua lelaki berkahwin dengan tujuan untuk makan di rumah. Lelaki akan merasa selesa setelah berkahwin kerana ada isteri yang akan menyediakan makanan dan mudah bagi mereka untuk makan. Berbanding wanita. Wanita yang hidup bujang masih tetap memasak. Jadi mereka akan terus memasak setelah berumah tangga malah menurut kajian wanita akan lebih minat memasak setelah berumah tangga. Mereka didapati akan mula gemar mengumpul resepi dan menonton rancangan masakan. Mereka akan mula tertarik dengan aksesori dapur seperti set kuali, periuk
dan alatan-alatan memasak walaupun pada zaman bujang mereka tidak bergitu. Apabila dapat menyediakan satu hidangan untuk suami dan melihat suami memakannya, isteri akan merasa cukup puas. Itu Hakikat!
Setelah berumah tangga, kebanyakkan lelaki tidak punya banyak aktiviti yang dapat mengeluarkan peluh. Hanya aktiviti seks sahaja yang dapat mengeluarkan peluh dan menjadi medium utama dalam pembakaran lemak mereka. Jadi lemak dari pemakanan mereka akan mula berkumpul di perut. Lama-kelamaan perut mereka akan mula membuncit atau dalam istilah lain boroi. Terdapat 2 jenis lelaki boroi, pertama lelaki dengan berat badan yang bertambah, bertambah gemuk dan berperut buncit, manakala jenis kedua di mana lelaki itu akan bertambah berat badannya tetapi masih lagi kurus cuma bahagian perut sahaja membuncit.
Walaupun saintifik tidak dapat menjawab bahawa lelaki yang boroi tanda mereka bahagia hidup berumah tangga, tetapi melalui kajian ianya terjawab dengan mudah. Hampir 92% lelaki berkahwin akan boroi setelah 2 tahun dan ke atas tempoh perkahwinan. Malah statistik penceraian juga melaporkan hampir 89% kes penceraian berlaku kepada suami yang slim dan masih tampan. Berbanding kadar penceraian yang melibatkan suami boroi hanya sekadar 19% kes penceraian. Mungkin anda terperanjat sekarang namun itulah hakikatnya. Jadi beruntunglah kepada mereka yang mempunyai suami boroi. Dan menurut kajian lagi, lelaki boroi lebih penyayang dan berfikiran jauh dan lebih mementingkan hidup berumah tangga.
Persepsi lelaki dan wanita cukup berbeza. 97% suami mula jemu atau mengelak untuk mengadakan aktiviti seks bersama isteri mereka apabila wanita itu mula gemuk, semakin tidak terurus, kurang perhatian kepada suami, melebihkan anak-anak dan apabila si siteri tidak lagi menitik beratkan penampilan. 97% kes penceraian datangnya dari masalah isteri yang sebegini.. Jadi awas dengan penampilan anda. Namun sebaliknya pula bagi isteri. Isteri tidak memandang ke arah rupa paras suaminya setelah berkahwin. Cukup sekadar menyisir rambut dengan kemas dan berpakaian kemas, isteri akan terus setia menyayangi suaminya meskipun si suami semakin bulat atau perutnya semakin membuncit dan ada di antara mereka yang mempunyai perut yang seolah-olah mahu meletup. Selalunya suami akan terus mengimpikan isteri yang cantik dan menarik sepanjang usia perkahwinannya tetapi isteri hanya sekadar mengimpikan suami yang bertanggung jawab dan penyayang dan paras rupa suami seperti boroi,
botak dan bau badan bukan lagi ukuran buat mereka sepanjang tempoh perkahwinan. Nampak sekali dunia ini tidak adil, namun itulah hakikat yang harus diterima sejak azali lagi. Oleh itu pada zaman dahulu kala hampir 77% wanita yang berkahwin memakai susuk untuk memastikan suami mereka akan terus setia dan tidak berkahwin lain. Lihat sahaja potongan pinggang mereka yang digelar pinggang kerengga, buah dada yang munggil dipadankan dengan kebaya ketat, punggung yang padat dan bersanggul tinggi, bagi mereka itulah kekuatan seorang perempuan.
Dari sudut lain pula mengatakan lelaki memang akan mudah buncit selepas berumah tangga atas faktor hubungan seks. Air zat isteri yang mengalir masuk melalui zakar semasa proses hubungan kelamin akan membuatkan perubahan hormon dalaman dan sekali gus akan mudah membuatkan mereka buncit. Semua lelaki tidak dapat lari dari permasalahan ini.. Faktor ini juga menyebabkan zakar lelaki yang berkahwin akan lebih mengembang dan besar berbanding lelaki bujang. Namun jika aktiviti seks tidak dilakukan dalam waktu tempoh yang lama buat seseorang lelaki yang pernah berkahwin, perut mereka akan kembali kendur manakala zakar pula akan mula mengecut malah kulit zakar akan mengering. Ini banyak berlaku kepada lelaki yang telah bercerai, mereka yang telah lama menduda ataupun mereka yang sudah lama tidak melakukan hubungan seks bersama pasangan.
Berlainan dengan wanita. Wanita yang sudah berkahwin dikatakan akan mempunyai kulit yang lebih lembut dan punya mood yang lebih baik. Kulit isteri yang lebih lembut dikatakan berlaku hasil daripada pancutan sperma suami yang mengandungi banyak protein dan khasiat yang terhasil dari pundi couper lelaki. Air mani yang dipancut ke dalam rahim isteri bukan sekadar boleh mendatangkan zuriat ianya juga akan bersatu dengan darah dan segala kebaikan air mani suami akan diserap kedalam tubuh isteri. Oleh itu wanita yang telah berumah tangga dan kerap menerima pancutan sperma suami cenderung mempunyai kulit yang lebih gebu dan lembab.Dalam Islam juga tempoh edah itu diberi kerana air mani bekas suami masih berada dalam tubuh isteri untuk diserap dalam tempoh beberapa minggu selepas hubungan kelamin yang terakhir sebelum penceraian berlaku. Ini untuk memastikan tidak berlaku percampuran air mani jika wanita itu terus berkahwin lain dan terus melakukan hubungan seks
dengan lelaki lain sebaik sahaja bercerai. Ada juga pendapat bahawa kebaikan air mani itu juga dapat dilihat pada rambut isteri yang semakin hitam dan berkilat. Campuran sperma suami di dalam tubuh isteri juga akan menghasilkan berjuta-juta hormon yang akan membuat wanita lebih ceria dan gembira. Berbanding wanita bujang atau yang menjanda, mereka dikatakan lebih mudah marah, kurang mood dan selalu tertekan.
Monday, June 22, 2009
Tarik desakan perletakan jawatan Nasharuddin, isu panas kerajaan perpaduan tamat serta-merta!
KUALA LUMPUR: Mursyidul Am PAS, Datuk Nik Abdul Nik Mat petang tadi mengumumkan menarik balik kenyataannya yang mahu Timbalan Presiden, Ustaz Nasharuddin Mat Isa meninggalkan PAS dan meletakkan jawatan ahli parlimen Bachok jika menyokong cadangan kerajaan perpaduan dengan Umno.
Tok Guru Nik Abdul Aziz yang juga Menteri Besar Kelantan menegaskan demikian dalam satu kenyataan yang dibaca selepas satu perjumpaan khas hampir dua jam, mulai 5 petang tadi di Pejabat Agung PAS di ibu negara.
Kenyataan penuh Tok Guru Nik Aziz bernada begini:
"Setelah berbincang dari awal hingga akhir dalam perjumpaan khas yang diadakan di Pejabat Agung (PAS) dalam semangat kekeluargaan bagi menangani permasalahan dalam beberapa isu politik semasa, yang dibesar-besarkan oleh media perdana, kami akhirnya bersetuju sebulat suara melupakan prihal salah tanggapan antara pimpinan atasan parti akibat daripada permainan politik parti Umno.
"Kami bersama-sama dalam satu saf yang padu, untuk terus bersama-sama memperjuangkan keazaman PAS bagi mendaulat Islam di persada tanahair.
"Kami juga bersetuju sebulat suara bahawa kerajaan perpaduan diberhentikan serta merta seperti yang telah diputuskan oleh Presiden PAS bersama Pakatan Rakyat dalam satu kenyataan bersama di bangunan Parlimen jam 2.30 tadi yang menolak sepenuhnya idea kerajaan perpaduan.
"Oleh yang demikian, selaras dengan itu, saya selaku Mursyidul Am PAS menarik balik segala kenyataan saya terhadap YB Ustaz Nasharuddin Mat Isa, Timbalan Presiden PAS dan dengan itu, ianya tidak berbangkit lagi."
Perjumpaan khas itu turut dihadiri oleh Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang; Ustaz Nasharuddin, Timbalan Mursyidul Am, Datuk Dr Haron Din; Naib Presiden - Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man, Salahuddin Ayub dan Datuk Mahfuz Omar - Setiausaha Agung PAS, Datuk Mustafa Ali, bekas Naib Presiden, Ahmad Awang, Ketua Dewan Pemuda, Nasruddin Hassan dan Ketua Muslimat Nuridah Mohd Salleh.
- Sanggah Tok Sago
Tiada lagi mengenai kerajaan perpaduan selepas ini.
Press Release
Pakatan Rakyat Council of Leaders
22 June 2009
The Pakatan Rakyat Council of Leaders today Monday, 22 June2009 held a meeting at the office of the Opposition leader and agreed on the following:
1. All the component parties of Pakatan Rakyat reiterate their commitment to each other and to strengthen the coalition in order to help form the future Federal Government
2. The Pakatan Rakyat Council of Leaders reaffirms our rejection of the idea of forming a Unity Government with UMNO/Barisan Nasional which is clearly a malicious and desperate attempt to compromise the integrity of the increasingly popular Pakatan Rakyat
3. Pakatan Rakyat agrees to adopt an open approach and is willing to hold discussions with the leaders of Barisan Nasional on issues of national interest such as economic recovery, improving the quality of education, restoring the integrity of the judiciary, abrogation of the Internal Security Act (ISA), the RM12.5 billion PKFZ scandal, abuse of power by the police leadership during times of increasing crime, eradication of corruption, establishment of good governance and to hold immediately a free and fair election to resolve the Perak crisis.
Pakatan Rakyat Council of Leaders
22 June 2009
The Pakatan Rakyat Council of Leaders today Monday, 22 June2009 held a meeting at the office of the Opposition leader and agreed on the following:
1. All the component parties of Pakatan Rakyat reiterate their commitment to each other and to strengthen the coalition in order to help form the future Federal Government
2. The Pakatan Rakyat Council of Leaders reaffirms our rejection of the idea of forming a Unity Government with UMNO/Barisan Nasional which is clearly a malicious and desperate attempt to compromise the integrity of the increasingly popular Pakatan Rakyat
3. Pakatan Rakyat agrees to adopt an open approach and is willing to hold discussions with the leaders of Barisan Nasional on issues of national interest such as economic recovery, improving the quality of education, restoring the integrity of the judiciary, abrogation of the Internal Security Act (ISA), the RM12.5 billion PKFZ scandal, abuse of power by the police leadership during times of increasing crime, eradication of corruption, establishment of good governance and to hold immediately a free and fair election to resolve the Perak crisis.
Tidak ada lagi bincang kerajaan perpaduan - Presiden PAS
Wan Nordin Wan Yaacob
KUALA LUMPUR, 22 Jun (Hrkh) - Majlis Presiden Pakatan Rakyat hari ini menegaskan pihaknya menolak sebarang usaha membentuk kerajaan perpaduan dengan UMNO.
Presiden PAS, Dato' Seri Tuan Guru Abdul Hadi Awang sendiri menyatakan, dalam isu Kerajaan Perpaduan, UMNO telah menjalankan fitnah yang jahat dan dengan itu pihaknya bertegas tidak lagi mahu membincangkan pembentukan kerajaan tersebut.
Apa yang diusahakan sebelum ini disalah tafsir oleh kepimpinan UMNO/BN untuk memfitnah PAS dan Pakatan Rakyat semata-mata memecahbelahkan hubungan pakatan, katanya.
Beliau berkata demikian ketika mengadakan sidang media bersama Sekretariat Majlis Presiden Pakatan Rakyat di Bilik Ketua Pembangkang, Bangunan Parlimen hari ini.
Turut hadir ialah, Ketua Pembangkang, Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim; Penasihat DAP, Lim Kit Siang; Naib Presiden PAS, Dato' Mahfuz Omar dan Salahuddin Ayub; Setiausaha Agung PAS, Dato' Mustafa Ali dan Dato' Seri Nizar Jamaluddin.
Sementara di pihak PKR, Presiden, Dato' Seri Wan Azizah Wan Ismail; Timbalan, Dr Syed Husin Ali; Naib Presiden, Azmin Ali dan Sivarasa Rasiah; anggota MT PKR, Saifuddin Nasution, dan di pihak DAP pula, Setiausaha Agungnya, Lim Guang Eng; Dato' Ngeh Ko Ham.
Sementara itu, Anwar yang membacakan kenyataan mewakili Pakatan Rakyat menyebut, Pakatan Rakyat menolak pengwujudan kerajaan perpaduan.
"Semua parti dalam Pakatan Rakyat mengulangi komitmen untuk terus bersama memperkasakan Pakatan Rakyat bagi membentuk kerajaan persekutuan akan datang," katanya.
Majlis pimpinan Pakatan Rakyat menolak idea penubuhan kerajaan Perpaduan dengan Umno/BN, yang merupakan suatu fitnah dan tohmahan serta tindakan terdesak Umno mengugat kekuatan Pakatan Rakyat yang semakin mendapat dukungan rakyat, tegas Anwar.
Menyokong pandangan itu, Salahuddin Ayub pula menyatakan kenyataan tersebut sebenarnya adalah muktamad dan ini bermaka tidak akan ada lagi 'unity talk' dengan Umno.
Malah Salahuddin kelihatan gembira dengan perkembangan itu yang seterusnya dilihat akan membuatkan Umno kelemasan.
Seorang lagi Naib Presiden PAS, Mahfuz pula memberi analogi bahawa 'Umno kini kehilangan tabung oksigen' apabila isu kerajaan perpaduan ini telah ditamatkan dengan kenyataan pimpinan pakatan.
Kenyataan itu juga sebagai satu usaha menutup talian hayat yang ada pada Umno/BN yang selama ini mengucarkacirkan pakatan dnegan penyelewengan isu kerajaan perpaduan, ujarnya./wann_
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)